The next generation of exhibition surveys is coming.
Industry benchmarking should be free for every organiser. Insight should arrive the day a survey closes, not six weeks later. And no feature should sit behind a paywall. ExpoPoll is built on those three ideas: better events, smarter insights, more automation.
Organisers only. One email when early access opens, nothing else.
Thanks. You're on the list.
- Industry benchmarks, free for every organiser. Today the industry standard sells them by licence tier. We think every organiser who contributes should see how their show compares, at no cost, from day one.
- Better events, smarter insights, more automation. The hours go on setting up, chasing and reporting. We automate all of it, so teams spend their time acting on what they learn.
- Nothing locked behind a paywall, and no annual licence. No Pro tier, no Lite tier, no "ask your account manager", no per-user seats. Every feature in every survey, paid per survey, at a fraction of what a yearly contract costs.

What's launching
Everything below is in every survey, for every organiser. Colours mark the audiences a feature serves: visitors, exhibitors, delegates, speakers.






Pick a playbook for exhibitions or conferences and every survey, invitation and reminder for every audience is written and scheduled from your show dates. Roll it forward next year in one step.
Exhibitor and visitor scores drawn on your hall layout, so location, footfall and value for money are seen together, stand by stand.
Compare every edition with the industry by sector, size and format. Included for every organiser who contributes anonymous totals. Never a licence tier.
Every question is checked against the show's history as it's written. An edit that would break an eight-year trend is held until someone approves it on purpose.
Summaries, themes from thousands of comments, and the drivers of satisfaction, ready the day fieldwork closes. Every sentence links to the chart or comment behind it.
A ranked list of exhibitors at risk, with the reasons, on their Salesforce accounts before rebooking opens.
One-tap session ratings from the agenda, speaker scorecards they can share, and content themes for next year's programme.
Under eight minutes on a phone, pre-filled from registration, saved as they go, in every language your audiences speak.
Import the exports from your current survey tool and we map past questions to your new ones, free, so eight years of trend lines arrive on day one.
Branded invitations from your subdomain, set up in a day, with reminders that skip anyone who has already answered. Or push links into your own email platform.
Every brand's contacts, consent and sender kept apart in the database itself. Group views see anonymous totals only.
Finished actions become a page in next year's invitation, so respondents see their feedback changed something.
The way it's sold today, and the way we sell it
Event survey software has been priced like enterprise software: an annual licence, tiers, seats, and a managed-service fee on top for each event. We compete on both the features and the price, and the price is per survey.
Industry benchmarking, free. This is what it looks like.
Every edition gets a ExpoScore, a published 0 to 100 formula over the core questions, and sits on a ruler against its peers: shows of similar sector, size and format, built from anonymous totals, with any group under ten hidden. Every organiser who contributes sees this screen. No upgrade, no licence tier.

By question, you against the peer median
Six editions, including imported history
Illustrative data. Real benchmarks need ten or more contributing shows per group; smaller groups stay hidden, so no show can be reverse-engineered.
Hall B, value for money
Summary, written the day fieldwork closed
Exhibitor value for money rose for a third edition, driven by lead quality on the two main aisles.Q12, n 412
Stands along the back wall of Hall B score a full point lower; footfall, not product fit, is the theme in 61 comments.themes
Visitors rate the theatre programme higher than last year; session length is the most common complaint.Q31, n 790
Exhibitors at risk of not rebooking
Illustrative data; company names are invented. Every sentence in the summary links to the question, comments or chart behind it.